Jim Black’s Alford Plea

[column parallax_bg=”disabled” parallax_bg_inertia=”-0.2″ extended=”false” extended_padding=”true” background_color=”” background_image=”” background_repeat=”” background_position=”” background_size=”auto” background_attachment=”” hide_bg_lowres=”false” background_video=”” vertical_padding_top=”0″ vertical_padding_bottom=”50″ more_link=”” more_text=”” left_border=”transparent” class=”” id=”” title=”” title_type=”single” animation=”none” width=”1/1″ last=”true”] [column_1 width=”1/1″ last=”true” title=”” title_type=”single” animation=”none” implicit=”true”]


by Allen Brotherton

Former NC House Speaker, Rep. Jim Black, entered a guilty plea to bribery and obstruction of justice charges in a state courtroom in Raleigh last week.  After pleading guilty, Black sat and listened while an SBI investigator testified about payments by Black to former Rep. Michael Decker to buy Decker’s vote in the hotly contested 2002 speaker election.  But when given an opportunity to address the court, Black reportedly said nothing about the alleged bribery, instead stating “I clearly take full responsibility for taking the cash from the three chiropractors in violation of the federal gratuities statute and state campaign finance law,”  apparently referencing his guilty plea a few days earlier to federal charges involving those cash receipts.

What was going on here?  Why didn’t Black say he was taking full responsibility for the bribery?  Didn’t he have to as part of his plea?  The answer is that despite his guilty plea he did not, because of the way he entered the plea.  Black chose to exercise his right to avoid admitting that he committed the alleged acts by entering what is called an “Alford plea.”

Under the procedure in North Carolina courts, a criminal defendant is arraigned with the question “How do you plead to the charge of (whatever crime is alleged)?”  If the defendant pleads not guilty, then the case proceeds to trial.  However, if the defendant enters a guilty plea, the judge then proceeds to determine, either through evidence or stipulation, whether a factual basis exists to support the state’s allegations.  Assuming sufficient evidence is presented, the judge then engages in a colloquy with the defendant to establish that the defendant is pleading voluntarily and understands the charges and the import of his plea.

The judge next proceeds to determine whether the defendant, after being advised of the consequences, still wants to enter the plea.  In the normal run-of-the-mill situation, the defendant is then asked “Are you in fact guilty?”  However, when a defendant chooses to enter an Alford plea, he does not answer that question, but instead is asked “Do you now consider it to be in your best interest to plead guilty?” and “Do you understand that upon your Alford Plea you will be treated as being guilty whether or not you admit that you are in fact guilty?”  Thus, by using this alternative, a defendant may plead guilty while continuing to assert his innocence.

This sort of plea derives its name from the U.S. Supreme Court decision approving the procedure, North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970).  Mr. Alford, charged with first degree murder, entered a guilty plea to second degree murder to avoid the possibility of the death penalty while maintaining his innocence.  He later tried to avoid the plea through a federal habeas corpus proceeding, leading to Supreme Court review.  The court essentially decided that a rational innocent person may choose to take a plea bargain rather than risk a worse outcome if found guilty after a trial.

Mr. Black has reportedly told others that he is innocent but does not want to impoverish his family by paying to defend himself through possibly numerous trials on these and perhaps other charges.  And it does appear that his plea bargain includes the provision that he will not be charged with other crimes if he provides full and truthful cooperation.  However, it remains to be seen whether the government will consider his cooperation truthful if he continues to maintain his innocence in the face of what prosecutors consider to be convincing evidence to the contrary.  And, as the court’s questioning at his state plea suggest, Mr. Black will be treated by the court as guilty and sentenced accordingly, his Alford plea and protestations notwithstanding.

Allen Brotherton as well as three other attorneys with Knox Law Center,  is a resident of Lincoln County and has been representing people charged with crimes, including traffic violations, for over 19 years. He can be reached at 704-372-136 or. The firm’s website is www.knoxlawcenter.com.  Opening soon is the newest office in Denver located at Hwy 16/73- Waterside Crossing.

[/column_1] [/column] [column parallax_bg=”fixed” parallax_bg_inertia=”-0.2″ extended=”true” extended_padding=”true” background_color=”” background_image=”http://knoxlawcenter.com/wp-content/uploads/scales-of-justice-extra-white.jpg” background_repeat=”” background_position=”” background_size=”auto” background_attachment=”” hide_bg_lowres=”false” background_video=”” vertical_padding_top=”30″ vertical_padding_bottom=”70″ more_link=”” more_text=”” left_border=”transparent” class=”” id=”REQUEST-CONSULTATION” title=”” title_type=”single” animation=”none” width=”1/1″ last=”true”] [text_divider type=”single”]

How Can We Serve You?
[/text_divider] [column_1 width=”1/1″ last=”true” title=”” title_type=”single” animation=”none” implicit=”true”] [push h=”-20″]

Fields with * are required.

[push h=”20″] [/column_1] [column_1 width=”1/1″ last=”true” title=”” title_type=”single” animation=”none” implicit=”true”]

    *This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    I have read the disclaimer.Privacy Policy

    [/column_1] [/column]

    Recent News & Articles

    Contact An Attorney Today

    Mar 4, 2020
     by Anonymous on Knox Law Center
    Exceptional Legal Representation & True Professional, Genuine Individual

    I first met Allen after he was recommended to me by a friend, and I couldn't be happier with the service that he provided. He demonstrated a unique attention to detail in my case, as well as expressed a genuine interest in me as a person. Through a great deal of hard work, Allen was able to appeal my case and get all of my charges dismissed. I couldn't be more grateful for him and his assistant, Sherry, for their legal and personal support during such a difficult time. Hiring Allen was the greatest decision I've ever made, and I would recommend Allen to anyone seeking exceptional legal representation.

    Feb 23, 2020
     by Anonymous on Knox Law Center
    The most amazing lawyer, a true gem & winner

    Allen is the best lawyer I've ever met! His character is genuine, and there is a warmth about him that makes you feel so comfortable. If you ever get into a situation with DWI, and feel truly remorseful for what happened, HIRE him for the BEST chance possible. I previously spent 6000$ on an attorney who just didn't feel like they really gave me the personal care that I needed. They were only in it for the money. After hearing raving reviews about Allen, I fired my lawyer and took a leap of faith with Allen. Even though I had to pay two separate times and could not get a refund for the previous lawyer, IT WAS WORTH EVERY PENNY!!!! He won my case with dignity, respect, and care and I am forever thankful to him for this.

    Page 1 of 17:
    Call Knox Law